Nonmaleficence, noninterference, and fidelity: environmental ethics in Gary Paulsen’s Hatchet (1986)
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | Cite this article
Save articleWe’re sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply.
Sections
Abstract
In the Anthropocene era, where human activities profoundly alter ecosystems, ethical reflections on human–nature relationships have become increasingly vital. Paul W. Taylor’s environmental ethics—particularly the principles of nonmaleficence, noninterference, and fidelity—provide a valuable framework for examining these relationships. Literature, especially young adult (YA) fiction, serves as a significant medium for shaping moral and ecological awareness among young readers. Despite its accessibility, YA nature writing has often been overlooked in ecocritical scholarship. This study explores the ethical dimensions of Gary Paulsen’s Hatchet (1986), a canonical YA wilderness survival novel that portrays the protagonist Brian Robeson’s encounters with animals, plants, and other nonhuman entities in the forests of northern Canada. Through the lens of Taylor’s Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (1986), this study analyses how Brian’s experiences reflect the recognition of animal agency, human vulnerability, and adherence to ethical principles governing human–nonhuman interactions. The findings suggest that Paulsen’s narrative embodies a deep ecological sensibility that aligns with Taylor’s nonanthropocentric ethics. This research enriches the understanding of Hatchet (1986) and contributes to broader ecocritical discussions on environmental ethics in young adult literature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Na Rao, Florence Toh Haw Ching, Hardev Kaur Jujar Singh
Na Rao
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required as the study did not involve human participants.
Informed consent
This study is a literary analysis and did not involve human research participants.
Additional information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the licence terms.
Source: Na Rao, Florence Toh Haw Ching & Hardev Kaur Jujar Singh. Nonmaleficence, noninterference, and fidelity: environmental ethics in Gary Paulsen’s Hatchet (1986). Original authors and source retained.
About this article
Cite this article
Na Rao, Florence Toh Haw Ching & Hardev Kaur Jujar Singh. Nonmaleficence, noninterference, and fidelity: environmental ethics in Gary Paulsen’s Hatchet (1986). Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08682-y
Download citation- Received
- 08 November 2025
- Accepted
- 04 August 2026
- Published
- 24 September 2026