ArticleOpen accessPublished: 24 September 2026

Uncovering the impact of ownership types on tax aggressiveness in Indonesia

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | Cite this article

Save article

We’re sharing this article early to provide faster access to peer-reviewed, accepted research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. This version is subject to further edits and will be replaced automatically by the final Version of Record. All legal disclaimers apply.

Sections

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to empirically test and analyze the influence of ownership structure, including family ownership, management ownership, institutional ownership, state ownership, public ownership, foreign ownership, and concentrated ownership, on tax aggressiveness (ETR and CFETR). The ETR indicates a company’s behavior in reducing corporate taxes, while the CFETR denotes tax aggressiveness in terms of cash flow used to pay corporate taxes. These two measures can provide clues about whether a company is tax aggressive. This study is based on two theories—agency theory and socioemotional wealth theory. While agency theory is used to examine the impact of tax aggressiveness, socioemotional wealth theory examines the impact of family ownership on tax aggressiveness. This study employed a quantitative approach, using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques to examine all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2023, yielding a total of 382 cross-sectional data units. The results of this study indicate that family ownership, management ownership, institutional ownership, state ownership, and foreign ownership have a significant effect, meaning that as the proportion of ownership increases, tax aggressiveness increases. In comparison, public ownership and concentrated ownership do not have a significant effect on tax aggressiveness. This study provides a new contribution to the capital market context in Indonesia, which comprehensively shows the types of ownership structures, namely family, managerial, institutional, state, public, foreign, and concentrated ownership, in relation to corporate aggressiveness. Future research should build on the results of this study to highlight the important role of shareholders in tax aggressiveness in Indonesia and other developing countries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Accounting Study Program of Economics Faculty and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Kiswanto Kiswanto, Laili Nurfiana, Ain Hajawiyah, Caraka Hadi, Atta Putra Harjanto

Economic Education of Economics and Business Faculty, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

M. Fathur Rahman

Kiswanto Kiswanto
Laili Nurfiana
Ain Hajawiyah
Caraka Hadi
Atta Putra Harjanto
M. Fathur Rahman

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Read the licence terms.

Source: Kiswanto Kiswanto, Laili Nurfiana, Ain Hajawiyah, Caraka Hadi, Atta Putra Harjanto & M. Fathur Rahman. Uncovering the impact of ownership types on tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. Original authors and source retained.

About this article

Cite this article

Kiswanto Kiswanto, Laili Nurfiana, Ain Hajawiyah, Caraka Hadi, Atta Putra Harjanto & M. Fathur Rahman. Uncovering the impact of ownership types on tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. Humanit Soc Sci Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09150-3

Download citation